Some Pending Cases

Suit Alleges Race-Based Discrimination by PG&E

In Pegastaff v. Corestaff Services LP, et al., filed in California Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff alleges that the Pacific Gas and Electric Company engages in illegal race- and gender-based discrimination in awarding contracts. Plaintiff, a supplier of temporary IT and engineering workers, alleges that Defendants discriminated against it because it was owned by a "non-minority" male, pursuant to a program of discrimination mandated by General Order 156 of the California Public Utilities Commission. 

 
Class Action against Capital One Bank

This nationwide class action filed by Litigation Law Group against Capital One alleges the credit card bank failed to keep its promise of a "low" "fixed" APR and unilaterally raised customers' credit card rates--often by as many as 10 APR points.

Read more...
Class Action Brought Against Gateway
  • STATUS, March 30, 2013: Presently Awaiting Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision on Gateway's Appeal of District Court Arbitration Ruling in Favor of Plaintiffs

  • On October 6, 2007, Gateway introduced the Gateway XHD3000 30-inch LCD monitor (“XHD3000”).  The XHD3000 was advertised as a state-of-the-art monitor that would provide a high-resolution display and many years of reliable service to videogame players and other persons who needed, and were willing to pay a premium for, a high-end display monitor. 

    The complaint in this class action case alleges that the named plaintiff bought the premium monitor for $1,638.75 but experienced sub-par performance.  The complaint alleges the display produced abnormal visual artifacts and would not perform as represented.  Problems alleged to have been experienced by the named plaintiff and numerous other purchasers of the monitor include flickering images, green tint over the entire screen, vertical multicolor lines, green lines, blanking, severe banding, screen flutter, side button issues, blackouts, red flickering lines, and complete screen failures. 

    The complaint alleges Gateway technical and customer support failed to provide a resolution to the problems experienced by users of the monitor.  

    The complaint alleges the XHD3000 was defective in its inception and design, and incapable of performing as represented.  The case seeks damages and relief for a nationwide class of persons who purchased the monitor.
     

    More Pending Cases

    Class Action Brought Against Gateway
    1. Class action brought on behalf of buyers of the Gateway XHD3000 30-inch LCD monitor alleges monitor is defective and will not perform as advertised.

    Read more...
     
    Class Action Alleges Facebook "Click Fraud"

    Nation-wide class action filed on behalf of Facebook advertisers alleges that advertisers were forced to pay for non-existent or fraudulent clicks, unlawfully increasing Facebook's revenues.

    Read more...
     
    Antitrust Class Action Brought against Netflix and Walmart
    Class action alleges Netflix and Walmart conspired to divide between them the markets for sales of new DVDs and online rental of DVDs, stifling competition and injuring consumers.
    Read more...

    Copyright © 2009 Litigation Law Group. All rights reserved.

    Joomla Templates by Joomlashack